oThe Brussels Symposium is underway! A stimulating first session with a challenging range of contributions from sharp commentators who all agreed on one thing ..... describing social media is relatively easy, explaining it rather harder! Follow the live coverage here
EuroBlog2008
- COMU
Département de communication, Université catholique du Louvain
- Edelman
- Euprera
The European Public Relations Education and Research Association - Euroblog 2007 - Survey and Conference
- EuroBlog2006
- IHECS
Institut des hautes études des communications sociales, Brussels
Participants' blogs
- Ansgar Zerfass
- Blogactiv - Europeans Challenge Europe
- Conversation Blog
Philippe Borremans - Das Textdepot
Thomas Pleil - mediations
Philip Young's weblog - Micro Persuasion
Steve Rubel - EuroBlog speaker - Neville Hobson
- PR Conversations
Toni Muzi Falconi
StatCounter
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Sue Wolstenholme on EuroBlog has started
- Greg on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Pietr on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- kaja on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Neville Hobson on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Richard Bailey on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Philip on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Markus Pirchner on EuroBlog 2008: Brussels March 13-15
- Mathew Lowry on How the EuroBlog message spreads (1)
- Philip on EuroBlog on del.icio.us
« Final Programme EuroBlog2008 | Main | Euroblog 2008 - Day 2 & 3 - Live coverage. »
March 13, 2008
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Hi Philippe, You have done a great job here and I have enjoyed reliving many of the fine moments. I just wanted to clarify a couple of points that the notes on my words did not put across very well. I actually applaud rag mags - I think they, along with many other anti establishment, underground or subversive publications, are important to fuel debate and drive change. And I wasn't calling for an ethical code, I cited that blog because one of the points on the proposed code was to be rid of anonymity -it was the only place that I found such a call. I stressed during the questions that I'm not fond of rule books but I was depressed by the style of the often anonymous comments on the 84 pages following Tim O'Reilly's call for a code. The ideas were more trashed than debated and it seemed pointless.
Posted by: Sue Wolstenholme | March 16, 2008 at 07:00 PM