Alexandra Cook (left) and Nicola Wilkinson wonder why students sign up for PR courses when they don't have a clue what it involves
After three years at university it's hard to remember why you chose that city, much less why you selected one particular course. Indeed it becomes evident that some students didn't decide; the choices were made for them. Some of these stick it out, even learn to enjoy it; others do not.
PR is a difficult discipline to define; almost impossible at university entry level, marginally easier on graduation, though perhaps only so because after three years you become used to justifying the wide range of working possibilities that fit within the "broad church" that encompasses our profession. So why do students sign up to study PR, if they don't clearly understand what it is? Few, we suggest, come to study PR based on a definite view of what it actually involves, and with a reasoned ambition to enter the business. Others - count us amongst them - are guided by a relative, teacher, or friend who claims to recognise some facility or attribute that suggests "you're a natural for PR". And so, without any great depth of knowledge or expectation, you sign up for a critical three years of your life on the basis of faith in that recommen-dation, or for lack of a better idea.
Recent Comments