Work in a bar, or get a PR degree? According to some in the industry, when it comes to jobhunting one is as good as the other. Christina S. Holm explains why they are wrong.
Wouldn’t you hire a qualified mechanic to fix your car or an accountant to do your taxes?
Here is a crazy one: How about a PR graduate to do your PR?
I recently graduated from Manchester Metropolitan University with an MA in Public Relations. I quickly got a job in an agency, but getting that all-important interview was more down to my perseverance than having a PR degree.
I later discovered I was the only candidate with a degree in PR who had made it to the interview - although many applied. That made me wonder whether it was because a PR graduate is only as qualified for a job in PR as any other graduate, or because employers do not know much about PR degrees. Perhaps universities should be doing some PR for their PR degrees?
On a random day in February I looked at the Vacancies page on the CIPR website. Of the 25 jobs advertised, only one said applicants should have a specific PR qualification. Another said: “Educated to degree level in communications, English or marketing”.
I have a degree in communications and, even though I learnt many valuable things, it did not qualify me to work in PR as my MA in PR did. So why is there this perception that one is as good as the other? Perhaps it is not as important when recruiting top level practitioners with many years experience, but isn’t it natural to ask for a PR degree when recruiting for a junior level PR job?
I concluded my MA with a dissertation examining what skills and personal characteristics are perceived to be the most important for PR practitioners entering the industry. It was based on interviews with UK agency practitioners. What became an important aspect of the research was the lack of interest in public relations degrees. Surprisingly, when asked what they thought, the answer was clear - a PR degree is not bad but not particularly an advantage. In fact, any degree would do.
One interviewee said: “That guy working down the road, who has been working in a bar for two years could just as well work in PR if he is creative, has got the personality is friendly and outgoing.”
I wondered if this perception was because they did not rate PR courses in the UK, or due to lack of knowledge about them, so I asked what they thought were the most important skills for new practitioners. Writing skills, language skills and media relations techniques came top of the list. I do not know the structure and content of all degrees but in mine, writing and media relations were some of the most important elements. Following this, interviewees were asked to put together a degree in PR to be most useful for the needs of their agency. Again, most items they chose were elements which are in fact taught in most degrees.
If the skills employers believed to be the most important are taught in PR courses, why do they not prioritise PR graduates? Before my job interview I was asked to plan a media campaign for a specific brief. I had 24 hours. My PR degree had equipped me strategically to analyse the market, consider the relevant target audience, identify the appropriate media and so on. I imagine a person with a degree in English would have about the same understanding of this process as a PR graduate has of Shakespeare.
Obviously many degrees involve writing, language and making presentations but to me there is far more to PR than that.
Bob Bion is the director of twentyfour7, a specialist legal PR agency, who in summer 2005 recruited me as an account executive. He said: “I wasn’t particularly looking for a person with a degree in PR. To be honest I thought any degree would do, as long as it included language and writing.”
Seven months later I asked him what he now thought of PR graduates. “I had never given it much thought before and didn’t really know much about PR courses. Now that I have, I think I might favour someone with a PR degree next time I recruit at that level.”
When I asked another colleague whether she rated PR degrees, she said: “I don’t know – I know a lot of people in PR who don’t have degrees and they are doing fine”.
I cannot argue with that. I have also worked with many well-qualified, successful practitioners who have never opened a PR book. All I am saying is let’s “raise the game”. Let’s get even better than we are now, then maybe one day we won’t have to persistently argue our place in the world of business. It is no secret that work experience is key to getting a job in PR. With a growing number of applicants, employers can afford to be selective and demanding. Because of this, unpaid work experience has become a necessary evil for students trying to get that very important foothold in this competitive industry.
One of my interviewees said about getting a job in PR: “I think it is just work experience. I think a lot of people get into it just doing work experience which is a faster route and cheaper than doing a course.”
PR practitioners are expected to hit the ground running and be fully fledged and experienced account executives from day one - ready to get down to business. Work experience gives you just that — the very basic skills to do very basic tasks. I did work experience, and admittedly came away a little wiser as to what it was like in “the real world”.
But I do not feel those hours spent selling-in Press releases to annoyed journalists and sticking Press cuttings on a presentation board were better spent than my year at university writing, planning and implementing media campaigns. What it gave me was a name to put on my CV to make future employers more comfortable taking on a green graduate. I would like to encourage employers to see further into the future.
My degree taught me so much more than just writing. It taught me the logic and strategy behind a successfully planned and implemented campaign. It educated me to understand other relevant disciplines such as marketing and design.
More importantly it gave me the answer to a question often asked by top management: “So why do we need PR?” If your employees can answer that convincingly, it might just land you a new client.
The question: “What is the key to success?” is one often asked in PR. I am happy to say my degree is a large part of my success if that means getting a job, achieving good coverage and, more importantly, having something relevant to say to that all important question. I feel I have something to bring to the table because of what I learned in my PR degree. If bar staff are perceived to be as qualified for a job in PR as a PR graduate, it is not so strange that the industry is still trying to earn a reputation for being a serious and important strategic discipline.
For PR to raise its profile in the business industry as being a serious player, it needs to embrace PR qualifications, and universities have an important role to play. I would like to encourage university lecturers across the country to communicate even more with the PR industry – find out what employers need and explain how you can give it to them.
Great post.
Lots of very good points here.
Many times I've gone through reassessment of the value of my degree and whether it was worth all the trouble and loans, or whether I could have done without it.
I don't think I could have done without it. I've learned so much in a very short amount of time. But I don't know if others will value my degree as much as I do.
I think there is also a difference, even if just a small one, between how PR degrees are viewed in the UK and how they are in the US.
But another aspect of this, about your closing argument, is can we even get better than we are?
I'm not saying we can't, just asking a question.
There are some who argue that PR is nothing but a trade industry, which, some believe, can't even be taught or taught correctly.
So can we even improve and become a better industry from the university level?
Posted by: Owen Lystrup | June 27, 2006 at 07:00 PM
As someone who has had to shell out tonnes of money (as an international student) to pursue a Master's in Corporate Communication, I'm glad to say that I got value for my money - to sound all cliched. I have just under two years of public relations experience, and my decision to study corporate communication was based on believing that it would hone my strategic skills, that is 'raise my game'.
Even if I have to wait some time to get a senior position, I know that as long as I keep updating my knowledge and learning from each experience, it will stand me good stead in the future.
The challenge for students of PR though is to bridge the idealism of academia with reality, so that when we enter the 'real-world', we can perform effectively using the best of both worlds. Then, employers will appreciate PR graduates a bit more.
Posted by: Karel Mc Intosh | July 03, 2006 at 11:40 PM
Christina's analysis is spot on. I teach PR and have heard employers say that they don't particularly favour a PR degree over any other.
The challenge is for both universities and graduating students to change 'hearts and minds' over time. Employers will be won over by people like Christina offering much more value than students with a non-specialist degree. In Birmingham we've now got to the position where having got one through the door, the path is getting easier for a second. Keep up the good work. You are all ambassadors.
Posted by: Caroline Wilson | July 09, 2006 at 05:10 PM
Well, many says PR is simply an applied commonsense. And of course there are many interdiciplinery subjects to PR like you have mentioned English and History, journalism and creative writing which are equally contributes to PR practice.
However, I agree with you on the fact that PR degree isn't just about studying PR diciplines, but also having been through many academic challenges gives you those valuable life skills as well, in my case I wasn't a natural effective communicator, but throughout my degree courses I've gradually become much of a chatterbox.
Also, a lot of employers seem to undervalue what knowledge and skills we have got from PR degree, as if we shouldn't have done it at first place, since we would need to start our careers from scratch anyway.
Posted by: Gerel | July 17, 2006 at 03:56 PM
This is something to be noted. Even though the importance of public relations is huge, still, society is not familiar with public relations. You made a point on that.
Posted by: Mary | August 24, 2006 at 06:13 AM
When the MA at MMU was set-up I asked one of the course leaders very excitedly about his PR experience. He replied he had never worked in PR. You can imagine that I was a little suprised. I looked at the course books and I must say that it was theory and over no interest to a PR man or a client - they have business aims and do not care what an academic writes, they want results.
Post grad degrees that make you feel better equiped to deal with your career are worth it for that reason alone. You should take courses if you are really intersted in what you do and that should be respected by others.
But saying that anyone with maturity and the nascient skills that can be developed to striking effect is the ideal. Degrees can help, but they are the packaging around the product and the person. The commitment to improve is what really counts.
As more people do PR degrees so the currency will become devalued like most degrees.
What really counts are the core skills - writing, media relations, cleint liaison - enthusiasm, contiual improvement, ability to play office politics, hard work, tenacity and luck.
Posted by: rob baker | November 01, 2006 at 08:19 AM